Examining our grading practices is important to ensure that all students are evaluated based on consistent and transparent criteria, regardless of their background or circumstances. Fair grading practices can identify where students need support and help educators tailor instruction to meet diverse learning needs. Grading practices can be designed thoughtfully to reduce bias, promote inclusion, and provide every student with a meaningful opportunity to succeed.
Our research highlights the following principles. (For more detail, including examples, see our Self-Assessment Tool and Samples Across the Disciplines, below.)
CSM ESL Instructor Kristy Ridgeway revised her grading policies to be more student-friendly. See her talk about her revisions below.
To help faculty assess their Grading Practices with regards to accessibility and cultural responsiveness, we collaborated on a rubric based on the principles above and incorporating example strategies. Coming soon, you will be able to print the self-assessment tool, if you would preferable an editable copy.
Getting REAL* | REAL | Liberatory | |
---|---|---|---|
Reflection Questions |
Do you provide students with clear information about how they will be assessed? Y/N/Partial |
Do you provide explicit guidance about how to succeed? Y/N/Partial |
Do you provide students with opportunities to see examples of student work and to practice assessing their own (and others’) work? Y/N/Partial |
Example Strategies |
|
|
|
*Each level ("Getting REAL," "REAL," and "Liberatory") represents a cumulative progression, incorporating and expanding upon the criteria of the preceding levels.
Getting REAL* | REAL | Liberatory | |
---|---|---|---|
Reflection Questions |
Do your grading practices fairly and consistently measure student achievement of the official learning outcomes (vs vague or potentially biased factors)? Y/N/Partial |
Do you support students who may need more time to achieve the course learning outcomes? Y/N/Partial |
Do you offer alternative ways for students to demonstrate achievement of course learning outcomes? Y/N/Partial |
Example Strategies |
|
|
|
*Each level ("Getting REAL," "REAL," and "Liberatory") represents a cumulative progression, incorporating and expanding upon the criteria of the preceding levels.
Getting REAL* | REAL | Liberatory | |
---|---|---|---|
Reflection Questions |
Do you provide students with multiple opportunities to receive feedback and learn from their mistakes? Y/N/Partial |
Do you provide students with structured chances to reflect and apply feedback? Y/N/Partial |
Do you encourage students to see grades completely differently, as means to the end of their own growth and mastery, rather than an end in itself? Y/N/Partial |
Example Strategies |
|
|
|
*Each level ("Getting REAL," "REAL," and "Liberatory") represents a cumulative progression, incorporating and expanding upon the criteria of the preceding levels.
Getting REAL* | REAL | Liberatory | |
---|---|---|---|
Reflection Questions |
Do you encourage students to communicate if they fall behind? Y/N/Partial |
Do you offer ways for students to recover after falling behind? Y/N/Partial |
Do you provide students with some flexibility in deadlines to manage their workload or competing responsibilities? Y/N/Partial |
Example Strategies |
|
|
|
*Each level ("Getting REAL," "REAL," and "Liberatory") represents a cumulative progression, incorporating and expanding upon the criteria of the preceding levels.
Below you will find examples of Grading Practice revisions by CSM faculty who participated in the REAL workshops in 2023-2025. Some are complete drafts, while others describe changes the faculty made and why. Please note that the sample materials submitted by faculty are works in progress and may not reflect final versions. They are shared to support collaboration and idea exchange.
Blum, Susan, editor. 2020. Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to Do Instead). Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.
Stachowiak, B., 2021, February 5. Ungrading with Susan Blum, in Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast.
Stachowiak, B., 2024, March 21. The principles of grading for growth w/Robert Talbert, in Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast
Stachowiak, B., 2023, September 14. Undoing the grade w/Jesse Stommel., in Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast
Feldman, J. (2019). Grading for equity : what it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin, a SAGE Company.
CSM Flex Day Session, 2023, January: "Beyond letters in the gradebook: A CSM faculty showcase on why and how to equitize our grading practices"